<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Politics on William Yang</title><link>https://willyang.netlify.app/tags/politics/</link><description>Recent content in Politics on William Yang</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.149.1</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2021 16:45:00 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://willyang.netlify.app/tags/politics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>US Japanese Trade War - and a case study of realism in international relations</title><link>https://willyang.netlify.app/blog/us-japanese-trade-war/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2021 16:45:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://willyang.netlify.app/blog/us-japanese-trade-war/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ll preface this post with the fact that this piece is not supposed to be read or interpreted as a rigorous academic work that is of the quality of a piece of original research. The purpose of this post is merely to espouse some of the thoughts I’ve had from background reading I’ve done recently in the realm of international relations, trade wars, the Japanese economy, and US unilateralism. As such, I will not be citing specific sources for some claims I make, but know the information I’ll be using can roughly be found in the additional reading articles at the end of this post.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>